1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma (168 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 1993 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Sigma |
Year Released | 1980 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 168 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |