1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 391 kg more than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Challenger |
Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2730 mm |