1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Nissan Pickup
To start off, 2000 Nissan Pickup is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Nissan Pickup. (82 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2000 Nissan Pickup.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro (291 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Nissan Pickup. (163 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1980 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Nissan Pickup.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 2000 Nissan Pickup | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Camaro | Pickup |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 2494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2960 mm |