1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Mazda B4000
To start off, 2001 Mazda B4000 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 210 kg more than 2001 Mazda B4000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Mazda B4000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | B4000 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2840 mm |