1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 845 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Minica |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2350 mm |