1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 270 kg more than 2004 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Camaro | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2540 mm |
