1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 770 kg more than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Camaro | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4097 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3510 mm |
