1980 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9000 (165 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000 should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chevrolet Camaro (291 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 1980 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
Model | Camaro | 9000 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1665 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |