1980 Chevrolet Citation vs. 2002 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Citation. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Citation would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 245 kg more than 1980 Chevrolet Citation.
Because 2002 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet Citation, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Chrysler Crossfire has automatic transmission and 1980 Chevrolet Citation has manual transmission. 1980 Chevrolet Citation will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chrysler Crossfire will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Citation | 2002 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Citation | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 3195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2410 mm |