1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 1969 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (135 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino weights approximately 245 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 1969 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | El Camino | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 2781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 81 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2960 mm |
