1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair
To start off, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair (153 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino weights approximately 95 kg more than 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (271 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair. (234 Nm). This means 1980 Chevrolet El Camino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | El Camino | Debonair |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 2971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 234 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1460 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
