1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (135 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (271 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | El Camino | ESX 3 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 332 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 3000 mm |