1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (197 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino weights approximately 88 kg more than 2000 Volvo S60.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (285 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (271 Nm). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | El Camino | S60 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1467 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2760 mm |