1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2002 Holden Barina
To start off, 2002 Holden Barina is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (135 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2002 Holden Barina. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Barina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino weights approximately 495 kg more than 2002 Holden Barina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (271 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Barina. (165 Nm). This means 1980 Chevrolet El Camino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 2002 Holden Barina | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | El Camino | Barina |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2500 mm |
