1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2003 Ford Puma
To start off, 2003 Ford Puma is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (135 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2003 Ford Puma. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino weights approximately 517 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (271 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Puma. (146 Nm). This means 1980 Chevrolet El Camino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Puma. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino has automatic transmission and 2003 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 2003 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 2003 Ford Puma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | El Camino | Puma |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 146 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1038 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2450 mm |