1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (135 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (130 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino weights approximately 70 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (310 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (271 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | El Camino | 6 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 130 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 310 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2680 mm |