1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2004 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2004 Skoda Superb is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Skoda Superb (148 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Skoda Superb should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino weights approximately 115 kg more than 2004 Skoda Superb.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (271 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Skoda Superb. (210 Nm). This means 1980 Chevrolet El Camino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Skoda Superb.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 2004 Skoda Superb | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
| Model | El Camino | Superb |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 19.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2810 mm |
