1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino weights approximately 127 kg more than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (271 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm). This means 1980 Chevrolet El Camino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino has automatic transmission and 2006 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chevrolet El Camino will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | El Camino | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 228 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 211 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2710 mm |