1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2012 BMW 520
To start off, 2012 BMW 520 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 520 (182 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino.
Because 2012 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 520 (380 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (271 Nm). This means 2012 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 2012 BMW 520 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
| Model | El Camino | 520 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 182 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4907 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1462 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2968 mm |
