1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP) has 250 more horse power than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino.
Because 2012 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-250 (548 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. (271 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chevrolet El Camino.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | El Camino | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 385 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 548 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1966 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 3967 mm |
