1980 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2012 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2012 Smart ForTwo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. At 4,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet El Camino is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (135 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2012 Smart ForTwo. (71 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 2012 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2012 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chevrolet El Camino (271 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Smart ForTwo. (125 Nm). This means 1980 Chevrolet El Camino will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet El Camino | 2012 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | El Camino | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 71 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 125 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |