1980 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2000 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Mercury Cougar is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 300 kg more than 2000 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Impala | 2000 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Impala | Cougar |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2710 mm |