1980 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2002 Holden Vectra
To start off, 2002 Holden Vectra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 100 kg more than 2002 Holden Vectra.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Vectra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet Impala | 2002 Holden Vectra | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Impala | Vectra |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 3175 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 209 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2710 mm |
