1980 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 575 kg more than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet Impala | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
| Model | Impala | Kangoo |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2620 mm |
