1980 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 885 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Malibu | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Malibu | Elan |
Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2140 mm |