1980 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 815 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet Malibu | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Malibu | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2060 mm |
