1980 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2000 Chrysler Concorde
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 100 kg more than 1980 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Malibu | 2000 Chrysler Concorde | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Malibu | Concorde |
Year Released | 1980 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |