1980 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Subaru Outback weights approximately 117 kg more than 1980 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Malibu | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Malibu | Outback |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |