1980 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2006 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 101 kg more than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Malibu. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2006 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 2006 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Malibu | 2006 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Malibu | Croma |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2197 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2830 mm |