1980 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 231 kg more than 1980 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2012 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chevrolet Malibu | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Malibu | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 285 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1706 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3881 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1826 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2423 mm |