1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1996 Toyota Picnic
To start off, 1996 Toyota Picnic is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 210 kg more than 1996 Toyota Picnic.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Picnic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1996 Toyota Picnic | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Picnic |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1335 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
