1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2005 GMC Safari

To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 496 kg more than 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.

Because 2005 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 2005 GMC Safari
Make Chevrolet GMC
Model Monte Carlo Safari
Year Released 1980 2005
Body Type Coupe Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3790 cc 4294 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 0 HP 190 HP
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 8 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1545 kg 2041 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1980 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1910 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2830 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]