1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2005 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2005 Seat Arosa is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 590 kg more than 2005 Seat Arosa.
Because 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2005 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2330 mm |
