1980 Chrysler 160 vs. 1963 Humber Sceptre
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 160 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1963 Humber Sceptre. (78 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1963 Humber Sceptre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Humber Sceptre weights approximately 38 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chrysler 160 (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Humber Sceptre. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Humber Sceptre.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 160 | 1963 Humber Sceptre | |
Make | Chrysler | Humber |
Model | 160 | Sceptre |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1124 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2570 mm |