1980 Chrysler 160 vs. 1963 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 160 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 656 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler 160 | 1963 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | 160 | Seven |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2240 mm |
