1980 Chrysler 160 vs. 1965 MG MGB
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 160 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 MG MGB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1965 MG MGB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 MG MGB (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1965 MG MGB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 160 | 1965 MG MGB | |
Make | Chrysler | MG |
Model | 160 | MGB |
Year Released | 1980 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |