1980 Chrysler 160 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 160 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 234 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 160 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | 160 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1980 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |