1980 Chrysler 160 vs. 1985 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1985 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 64 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Because 1980 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 160 | 1985 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Chrysler | Plymouth |
Model | 160 | Reliant |
Year Released | 1980 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2260 mm |