1980 Chrysler 160 vs. 1998 Ford Royale
To start off, 1998 Ford Royale is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Because 1980 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Royale, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 160 | 1998 Ford Royale | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 160 | Royale |
Year Released | 1980 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |