1980 Chrysler 160 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi L 200
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 weights approximately 734 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler 160 | 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 160 | L 200 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2477 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2970 mm |
