1980 Chrysler 160 vs. 2007 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Jaguar XJ is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jaguar XJ (401 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jaguar XJ (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2007 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler 160 | 2007 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | 160 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 401 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 560 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3040 mm |
