1980 Chrysler 160 vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 192 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm). This means 2011 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 160 | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 160 | UTE |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 132 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |