1980 Chrysler 160 vs. 2012 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2012 Opel Meriva is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Opel Meriva (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Because 1980 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Opel Meriva (175 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2012 Opel Meriva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 160 | 2012 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Chrysler | Opel |
Model | 160 | Meriva |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |