1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1946 Peugeot 202
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler 1609 (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1946 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1946 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 314 kg more than 1946 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 1609 | 1946 Peugeot 202 | |
Make | Chrysler | Peugeot |
Model | 1609 | 202 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1133 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2460 mm |