1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1953 DKW F 89
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler 1609 (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1953 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1953 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1953 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Chrysler 1609 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler 1609. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 1609 | 1953 DKW F 89 | |
Make | Chrysler | DKW |
Model | 1609 | F 89 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2360 mm |