1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1960 Ford Popular
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Popular. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Popular would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler 1609 (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1960 Ford Popular. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Popular. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1960 Ford Popular. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 1609 | 1960 Ford Popular | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 1609 | Popular |
Year Released | 1980 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 31 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2220 mm |