1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler 1609 (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler 1609 | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chrysler | DAF |
| Model | 1609 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2060 mm |
