1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1968 Mazda R-100
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda R-100 (110 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda R-100 should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chrysler 1609 (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1980 Chrysler 1609 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 1609 | 1968 Mazda R-100 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 1609 | R-100 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2270 mm |