1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1972 Mazda Luce
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 2,620 cc, 1972 Mazda Luce is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Luce (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Luce should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda Luce weights approximately 155 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 1609. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Luce (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Luce will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Chrysler 1609 | 1972 Mazda Luce | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | 1609 | Luce |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 2620 cc |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2590 mm |
