1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1977 Rover 3500
To start off, 1980 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rover 3500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rover 3500 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Rover 3500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Rover 3500 (157 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1980 Chrysler 1609. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Rover 3500 should accelerate faster than 1980 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Rover 3500 weights approximately 272 kg more than 1980 Chrysler 1609. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Chrysler 1609 | 1977 Rover 3500 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | 1609 | 3500 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 157 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1372 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2820 mm |